Posts
Went on quite a drive today. Everyone is concerned about the range of electric cars and fear it will be insufficient. At least when test driving, it is MORE than sufficient. It was again unseasonably warm, and two hours in the seat was a bit more than I had sought to enjoy.
I drove the beast out state highway 177 to country road V, thence to 177 to join US Highway 61 North. Highway 61 is one of those old scenic highways that was once a national artery, bypassed by the Interstate largely. It's a lot like Route 66 but about five less.
This is hilly, winding blacktop road through scenic country. Speed limit ranges from 40 to 65. I drove it between 50 and 60/65 almost entirely. I did finish at 70 mph for a 10 mile stretch on I 55 coming home. The route took me to Perryville Missouri, which has a reasonable facsimile of a Kentucky Fried Chicken. Cape Girardeau's KFC is notorious mostly for food poisoning.
The route convered 171.9 kilometers or 106.83 miles. We consumed 173.5 of our 180 theoretical ampere-hours. The Xantrex LinkPro made this quite easy to monitor. Of course, therein lies a tale. The result is 1.009 AH per KM or a little over 1.6 amp hours per mile. This works out to right at 190kWh per mile for the car. We also weighed it last week at 1986 lbs. This is nearly 200 lbs lighter than Speedster Senior at 2190. We did NOT have the hood an bonnet on part Duh when we weighed it though.
There are a couple of things notable about this. This drive is within 2/10ths of the longest drive in Speedster Senior. We get virtually identical AH per mile. The AC induction motor, 3 phase controller, and pressure tranducer driven regenerative braking, all put together, amount to just about NOTHING.
We have heard this chant about regenerative braking for years now. I did plenty of braking. We went down plenty of hills. We slowed into plenty of curves. The supposedly more efficient AC motor and the regenerative braking CANNOT BE DETECTED WITH TEST INSTRUMENTS. It's all a fraud. A lovely theory. A hope for efficiency. But a fraud.
You can niggle this to death however you want. More in the city. Stronger regen settings. Weaker regen settings. Regen on neutral and regen on braking only. We had regen. We started. We stopped. We did hills. No impact. Nada.
Yes, we'll do further experiments to see ensure apples to apples and oranges to oranges. The Speedster Senior is nearly 200 lbs heavier for example. But comparing these two vehicles, I find one thing VERY interesting. A lot of effort to go to a 3 phase controller, ac induction motor, etc. It would appear that if you are bemoaning the limited capabilities of the Netgain Warp 9 motor, you've been reading too much of too many people typing themselves smart. The old DC series motor and controller work fine. And the improvements you'll get with AC induction are mostly in your mind. Ok, you don't have to change brushes. Beyond that, methinks much over little.
The reports of 20% gains from regen are just total bullshit - off the table forever. Doesn't happen. How does this get started? Well some of these people are arithmetically crippled for one thing. The only thing I can imagine is they are recording 120 AH out, 20 AH regen, net 100 AH and concluding a 20% efficiency. First, the math is wrong. But second, the thinking is flawed.
We count amp hours to determine how much energy is used to go forward. The point is to go forward. Not to manipulate amp hours. It might be that coasting is a better use of the energy than all that regening.
Truth to tell, I had turned off the neutral braking regen for this trip and DID coast. I assumed I would get SOMETHING from braking. Apparently not much. I can't find it in the rounding errors.
Here are the finished cell voltages:
Cell 1 2.973
Cell 2 3.007
Cell 3 2.979
Cell 4 2.991
Cell 5 2.993
Cell 6 2.944
Cell 7 2.956
Cell 8 2.978
Cell 9 2.956
Cell 10 2.992
Cell 11 3.142
Cell 12 3.165
Cell 13 3.151
Cell 14 3.166
Cell 15 3.135
Cell 16 3.166
Cell 17 3.168
Cell 18 3.178
Cell 19 3.170
Cell 20 3.181
Cell 21 3.163
Cell 22 3.140
Cell 23 3.156
Cell 24 3.170
Cell 25 3.150
Cell 26 3.168
Cell 27 3.151
Cell 28 3.161
Cell 29 3.163
Cell 30 3.165
Cell 31 3.168
Cell 32 3.161
Cell 33 3.155
Cell 34 3.137
Cell 35 3.153
Cell 36 3.169
Anyone notice anything beyond the skipped line I inserted to call your attention to it? The cells are remarkably well "balanced" I thought for this end of the discharge curve. Clearly the cells have more than 180AH capacity. At 173 we really aren't down to the magic 3.00 volt level. There was probably another 10 miles in the car. Very pleased I didn't drive them.
This largely because the FIRST 10 cells are significantly lower than the rest. Why? Well, we have the Xantrex LinkPro connected to them. And while it features a very modest drain normally, I really like the backlight and have it on all the time. Unfortunately, the first 10 cells are what we use to power the Xantrex. And it is on 24x7 of course.
We've only been driving 3 weeks. Over the course of a year, this could lead to a serious difference in these cells, and ultimately the death of some. We can't turn the car loose on nonEV enthusiasts without fixing it. And I've no idea how to fix it. In fact, I'm having more instrumentation ideas all along, but they all come from the concept of powering from the traction pack to avoid isolation issues with the 12vdc system.
We HAVE to have an AH counter. And we CAN'T have an AH counter. I don't know.
The daughter box, which has been reduced to a daughter potentiometer and a couple of wires, worked marvelously. It came and went for about two miles. It would run normally, and then trail off as the throttle divider cut in. Then it would regain somehow and go some more, and then cut in again. After five or six iterations, it just stayed cut in and we had to limp home. It would limp ok. But it was clearly a sign the car was hurt and we had to creep home. I had it set a little generously because I wanted to see how far the car would go. WE'll simply set it for a battery size of 144 AH and use the 0% level to trigger. This will limit the cars range to 144 km of course, about 90 miles.
As noted in the video, we had a problem with the tachometer cutting out at 3500 rpm. It was a simple fix. On the theory that the thing was turning into a generator and overdriving our tachometer, we installed a 7.5kohm resistor between the signal lead and ground lead. Problem gone. The tach is rock steady and confirmed in accuracy by the weeny little numbers on the Curtis 840 display.
The heat exchanger wasn't getting rid of enough heat. We installed the old oil cooler that came with Speedster Senior in its place. Works great now. A little noisy.
If we are in third gear, and we press on the brakes deploying regen, it pops the transmission out of third gear. We've tested the shift mechanism extensively. The guys at Long Street agree that it has to be the transmission. So we have to pull the transmission, seal it in a manila envelope, and mail it to them - using an extra postage stamp I suppose. Easier said than done. Does ANYONE test ANYTHING before they ship it these days? Do you have any idea how many components we receive from American companies that are DOA out of the box? In fact, it is about a 1 out of 6 chance it won't even be the item we ordered at all.
Do you know how many we've received from China? None. Never. Nothing. Well.... we DID receive a charger from Thundersky several years ago with the voltage adjust knob broken off and missing. I couldn't figure out how to adjust it. Then I looked at the product photos online and saw what it was SUPPOSED to look like. We had a replacement in 3 days.
In any event, I'm very pleased with the car. It's a 100 mile car. We'll set daughter mode at 90 miles just for grins and to protect the cells. But it will do 100 miles driven for pleasure. We made no attempt at "hypermiling" or anything like that. It wll undoubtedly do more in town. And it will undoubtedly do less all freeway. But the winding country blacktop highway we took it on is just perfect for a Porsche. And yes, I'm a little tired from the two hour drive in the sun, but it was really quite enjoyable all the way around.
As to range, I guess it's a matter of seeing a glass half full. I'm amazed it will go this far this fast on batteries. I may never get over it. It's all the driving I want to do in a day. And it does it well.
Jack Rickard
Monday, June 28, 2010
Sunday, June 20, 2010
Duane Ball's Spyder 550
This week is a fairly short show. We mostly feature Duane Ball's Electric Beck Spyder 550 build. Built by Scott Smith in New York state, this car features many of the components in our own Speedster Part Duh prototype. It is an excellent example of craftmanship in an EV build.
Here are some further detailed photos.
This is the slotted heat sink for the Curtis 1238. This should provide excellent cooling for this controller.
The Spyder filler cap is most interesting. In this case, it allows external connection of the power cord.
This is a shot of the front compartment
This shot shows the rear compartment. Click on any of these for a larger view.
We continue to work on Speedster Part duh. Truth to tell, we did our first test drive this week. It will be featured in next weeks show.
We put some further thought and experimentation into the daughter box and valet function. Essentially, we eliminated the box entirely. We're down to a couple of resistors and a switch wired to the Xantrex LinkPro. Here's the Linkpro connections:
It simply applies a current limit resistor of 100 ohms and a 5k 10-turn pot across the 0-5v throttle output to throttle return lines. Either the valet switch or the Xantrex can do this. We measured throttle inputs TO the controller using teh Curtis 1311 Programmer and it works fine.
We also found that the Curtis would NOT drive our two series Gigavacs. These comprise a 24 volt coil together, but the Curtis did not agree. So we replaced them with a Kilovac LEV200A5NAA contactor and the Curtis is now quite happy.
Jack Rickard
Here are some further detailed photos.
This is the slotted heat sink for the Curtis 1238. This should provide excellent cooling for this controller.
The Spyder filler cap is most interesting. In this case, it allows external connection of the power cord.
This is a shot of the front compartment
This shot shows the rear compartment. Click on any of these for a larger view.
We continue to work on Speedster Part duh. Truth to tell, we did our first test drive this week. It will be featured in next weeks show.
We put some further thought and experimentation into the daughter box and valet function. Essentially, we eliminated the box entirely. We're down to a couple of resistors and a switch wired to the Xantrex LinkPro. Here's the Linkpro connections:
It simply applies a current limit resistor of 100 ohms and a 5k 10-turn pot across the 0-5v throttle output to throttle return lines. Either the valet switch or the Xantrex can do this. We measured throttle inputs TO the controller using teh Curtis 1311 Programmer and it works fine.
We also found that the Curtis would NOT drive our two series Gigavacs. These comprise a 24 volt coil together, but the Curtis did not agree. So we replaced them with a Kilovac LEV200A5NAA contactor and the Curtis is now quite happy.
Jack Rickard
Friday, June 4, 2010
Life in LiFePo4 - Cycle Life and Attenuation Data
Kind of a late blog entry. Busy week with Rickard Electric Speedster design. The May 28th show rounded up a lot of little parts such as the accelerator - with a little valet function box I refer to as "daughter mode."
The basic concept is that we can use the TBS E-Xpro instrument to monitor state of charge by AH. And we can kind of flexibly define a percentage SOC based on any AH value we like. The unit will close a relay when a defined value is reached. But a relay to what?
I have a bevy of daughters. Not to denigrate them, but they are not precisely EV enthusiasts, although they like cars and like the feel of an electric. But when out and about, if they did start to "run out of gas", I'm trying to visualize something that would convey to them that it is time to go home, and if they don't go home, it will cost Dad about $9000 in batteries.
An LED probably won't cut it. I can picture a daughter saying "Hmmm, a light. I wonder what that's about. I better ask Dad when I get home." She would then continue her travels until it suited her.
With a buzzer or audio alarm - "Hmm, that's certainly annoying. I better ask Dad to fix that next time I see him. "
So what can I do to get her to have a sense of urgency that there is something wrong with the car that needs attention NOW.
Well of course we could easily wire this up to a controller input to disable the controller. But this is a little extreme. What if she is in traffic and needs to get off the road?
The concept we've settled on is in no ways original. It is commonly referred to as limp mode and indeed there are some ways to do it in the controller. Our Curtis determines state of charge by voltage and I'm none too enamored of that. I want to use the AH counter.
So we devised a very simple little box, it has not enough circuitry to even be considered a circuit. Indeed there is no circuit board. It's a couple of resistors wired across the terminals of a relay.
In normal operation, it simply passes the 0-5v throttle signal from the throttle through the normally closed contacts of a 12v automotive relay to the controlller.
We can use a small dash mounted switch OR the TBS amp hour counter relay to pass 12v to the valet box to activate it.
This simply divides down the voltage to about 1/4 of its normal value before connecting it to the controller. I've added a 5K pot to trim this from the 1/4 value down to zero basically.
We also made kind of a discovery with our Vantage Vehicles GreenVan. This miniature van is a very el cheapo little Chinese cargo van that is SO small and SO basic and so ugly it actually starts to look cute. The company is based in Corona California (http://www.vantagevehicle.com).
But we were surprised to learn they used some pretty high quality components in the "conversion" they do to these vehicles. The system is 72v but use some unidentified but physically enormous AGM cells of 198Ah. The charger is a DeltaQ. These are really pretty nice chargers though not adjustable. The only reason we don't talk more about them is they are just focused on the low voltage market. I think the highest voltage they will do in their product line is 96volts. And just about no one is doing 96v in EVland. It's kind of a Neighborhood ELectric Vehicle thing.
The motor is also a little mysterious, but seems to be a 10HP three phase AC induction system with a 35 HP peak rating.
To drive that, we were a little astounded to find a Curtis 1238-6501 three phase controller. This is the 80V version of the controller we are using in the Speedster (Curtis 1238-7501).
The system appears to do regenerative braking only on applying the brakes. I'm increasingly leaning toward this on the Speedster and the Mini is now dialed down to very low values when you take your foot of the accelerator, but quite a bit when applying brakes.
The GreenVan does this a little differently. Instead of simply keying on the brake light signal, they employ a pressure transducer in the brake line to convert brake pressure to a 0-5v signal into the controller. The transducer gets 5v and ground from the controller, and puts out a voltage varying across its 500 psi range.
I thought this transducer might be hard to find. We located the company that makes it, MEAS Specialties, and contacted them. Never even got a reply to an e-mail. Before calling, I looked around a bit on the net and worked out their part number scheme. Turns out, it is VERY commonly available on Digikey at $104 each - Digikey part number MSP3501P2-ND. And you can get them at various pressures, 250 psi, 500 psi, 1000 psi etc. This might be important. I don't know how well our Speedster pressures will match the GreenVan's.
Anyway, this will take some experimentation to get the feel right, and may not be enough improvement to justify the effort. But I like the feel of the GreenVan's brakes.
May 15th marked the 1 year anniversary of our first video post. As many of you know I was in publishing before (print magazine) and just love the business. I've tried other businesses, but after publishing, nothing really makes any sense to me. I've seen them and they didn't make sense. So I would try them myself, and was surprised to learn I had nothing to learn there. Most of them just don't make much sense. It's hard to move heavy objects around for a 30% markup.
One of the things about publishing that I understand viscerally is about the flow of information. You give it away. To anybody who will listen. And you can't give it away FAST enough to avoid becoming successful at it. The only way to fail at publishiing really is through a lack of generosity of spirit. If you start viewing information as proprietary and valuable, you generally sell off the office furniture at auction a few months later. If you strive to pick up information gems and IMMEDIATELY give them way, it seems it rains money and other good things.
This is a bit counterintuitive. But one of the keys is that the information is not one way, and you are not really the producer. If people find the info useful, and gradually come to trust that it isn't a trick, they start to add to it. It's kind of a stone soup process. You of course have to initiiate it with the stone. But soon people are showing up with cartots, vegetables, onions, potatoes, etc.
Basically, you become a goto focal point where people can usefully promulgate useful information. As these contacts improve in quantity and quality, your information flow improves dramatically, and becomes something quite beyond what you are actually capapable of. Your role kind of devolves to sorting and categorizing, trying to filter through to find the gems that your readership, in this can viewership, might find useful. The more useful, the more people tune in, and the information sources grow and improve.
The good news is that you wind up with a lot of information. The bad news is, there are some real world problems publishing all of it. This gets a little hard to explain. But what made us very successful at Boardwatch was we got very good at sorting out the bullshit from the infogems - initially through hard work and experimentation. But over time we just developed a feel for it. But the other skill that is kind of hard define, goes hand in hand with the generosity of spirit.
It's actually hard to describe. If I use the word "tact" the people that know me in the forums I've just left are going to laugh outloud. Simillarly "appropriate judgement" rather fails. How about a "sensitivity to info issues."
Most everyone loves secrets. And the greatest joy is in telling them. Even greater is seeing them told widely. And often the value of the infornation is kind of tied to how secret it is. Scarcity being a key element in the value of anything.
Unfortunately, in the real world, we face certain ethical dilemmas. We may not quite approve of what our employer is doing and have a need to get some information out, but on the other hand, you don't want to lose your job in today's economy - with a couple of young children to feed and an upside down house payment.
So the GM Volt engineer loves to call and chat about some very interesting things. But if her employer knew she was putting this info out, there would be a rather immediate career change. And often, just the nature of the information points to the likely source.
So one of the frustrations is that I wind up with some inflows that are terribly interesting, but I don't know precisely how to deal with them without wrecking lives and careers. At one time, I was pretty brutal with this. "If you have a secret that needs to be a secret, why in the hell are you calling a magazine editor?"
Unfortunately, our actions have consequences, and often the consequences are someone ELSE's consequence. And if you see this go down a couple of times, you just can't help but become a bit more discrete. Time heals all. Often a month or so in the "aging cellar" changes the whole situation and no harm no foul then.
Sometimes, I can just generate this info out of thin air without attributing a source. That makes me look very smart. That's not precisely the goal. If it came to me in a dream or I'm a little vague about it, occasionally there is a reason. But it appears it would damage someone or something if I get too detailed on where it came from.
That's all a rather long winded tour of the joys of journalism. I really like the position and I'm frightfully good at it. But like Chess or Bridge, you never really master it. Actually, I always assume some portion of our viewership/readership is actually a lot more knowledgeable and a lot more intelligent than I am. It's not ALWAYS the case, but it's a good assumption to start from and particularly appropos in technical fields. Everyone is a specialist. And by definition I have to be a generalist. So, it's pretty real. Those in that ca
tegory will hopefully pick up from this why some elements of EVTV are always going to look a little odd.
For the rest, here's a little example. You may or may not know that I'm particularly enamored of these Chinese prismatic cells. Of course the reason is obviously weight and volume to power - they make electric cars viable in a way that lead acid, NiMH, etc simply cannot in a very ratiometric fashion. The particulars of the lead acid battery are immaterial. At that size and that weight and that power, it just doesn't work except for toy demonstrators.
But for now, the price is high. So high, that the only way this works is if the cells last a very very long time compared to the other battery technologies. If you have to replace them every three or four years, you have simply moved the operating expense from the gas pump to the battery store.
But at some point in longevity, rather keyed to the life of the car, the expense moves out of the recurring operating category and into the capital expense of the vehicle itself. We no longer talk about miles per engine. In fact, miles per tire used to be an EXTREMELY important factor in tire sales. It just isn't anymore. True, we go through a few sets in the life of the car. But somewhere past 50,000 miles, we ceased caring very much.
The heart of all this is that a good Trojan lead acid cell is rated at 350 cycles. The LiFePo4 cells are spec'd at 2000 cycles if we limit discharge to 80%, and 3000 cycles at 70%. Thundersky recently went to 3000 and 5000.
Those deeply experienced in the lead acid pool, have pooh-poohed this forever as being hopelessly optimistic. I feel their pain, but I've known for some time that it is off base. Part of this is cultural and part technical. The good news is that your LiFePo4 cells will last a VERY long time unless you actually destroy them, and of course a BMS is a quick way to accomplish this.
The cultural part is pretty broad. You have to understand the Chinese a little bit. "Managers and Scientists" are very highly regarded there. "Salesmen" are almost viewed in the same light as street hawkers selling roast peanuts. And it is not seemly to brag on your children. Indeed there are some serious karmic issues with mentioning your children in a positive light. And finally, if you ask a question of a superior in China, you are basically challenging him. If it is something for you to know, he would have already told you.
This all sets us up for some serious disconnects with America. First, in the good ol' USA, if you will do 180AH sometimes, even for a second, label it 180AH. Better, let's call it 190AH. Who measures? If it's a problem, we can always add a four point disclaimer at the bottom of the back page.
In most American corporations, the sales and marketing guys not only pretty much rule the game, that's almost always where the CEO's come from.
What you will find in dealing with the Chinese is that if they tout it as a feature or specific value, it will ALWAYS exceed that value - or at least they really did believe it would. They actually pad things the OTHER way. We're right around 190AH, - label it 180AH and we will not appear unseemly.
Second, the sales person you might be dealing with is essentially POWERLESS in the organization. They have to get permission to use the restrooms. And if you press them for technical information necessary to make the sale, you put them in a very awkward position. They either have to go appear to challenge their boss, a very painful prospect, or risk losing the sale. They do NOT work on commission as is common here, but failure is its own reward in China and you do NOT want to fail as a salesmen. There is no lower place to fall to. So you might note a little stress from a simple question about how they come up with cycle life data.
In China QUALITY is the golden horizon. The executives there actually do not understand why we want all this info. Don't we know they are claiming to have the HIGHEST QUALITY - GUARANTEED. Who would want more than that?
Finally, they're just a bit secretive about everything germane. I myself don't quite undetstand this, but all Chinese drama centers on a secret. The companies who make these batteries are not scientific in nature. They discover nothing and they invent nothing. They do develop manufacturing processes to ensure quality and output. The cathode material in the China Avaition Lithium Battery Company cell comes from a company titled ALEES in Taiwan. They buy it by the barrel. Similarly, you can buy aluminum foil and copper foil in China in a wondrous array of widths, lengths, and weights and some if it even perforated in various ways.
What you know of as a battery company in China develops clean rooms and workshops with some automation and they order these materials and produce a lot of cells - 1000 cells per day say. They know about as much about the chemistry as my daughter does.
They DO do testing, for quality purposes. And of course to develop better batteries with higher outputs etc. But the data is for internal use only and indeed, the salesmen aren't normally very privy to it.
I did stumble upon a pretty bright sales guy with Sky Energy. And he was pretty good at hunting down information although this was a painful process taking weeks and dozens of e-mails to get even the most basic info. He appears to have not made the cut in the transition to CALB - probably too inquiring and uppity.
One of the most fascinting things I got from him was an actual .XLS spreadsheet listing the AH values from 500 cycles of testing for what they term "attenuation" or the decrease in capacity over time from cycling the cells. I got one of these for the 180AH cells and one for the 100AH cells, with two cells tested and the actual values. I've prepared a couple of simple graphs from this data.
There are a couple if interesting things about this test. First, the 500 cycle length is impressive. This is 500 actual cycles, in a world where lead acid cells are ESTIMATED to have a 350 cycle life. They show a pretty uniform 5% degrade from their initial value - and it appears to be quite linear. That implies 2000 cycles easily to 80% of initial capacity.
More encouraging, the initial value is ABOVE the rated capacity. And indeed we are just starting to break below advertised specs AT 500 CYCLES.
The tests are of course at a very moderate 0.3C. But the thing that just blows me away is that all 500 cycles are to 100% discharge - not 80% or 70%. They run until the voltage at 0.3C breaks 2.0v which is their definition on the spec sheets of 100% discharge.
So what the data appears to show is a minimum 2000 cycle life at 100% discharge. They are fudging this to 2000 cycles limited to 80% and 3000 cycles limited to 70%.
In America, we would test at 50% DOD, claim the 3000 cycles, and not mention this silly depth of discharge thing at all. Or else it would appear at the bottom of the back cover of the report with a tiny little cross and in 2 point type.
So I am very taken with the prospects for long life from these cells. They just appear to be bullet proof to me.
Another interesting aspect that explains some of my own observations. These cells appear to INCREASE in capacity over the first 50-75 cycles. Further, the curve made looks just a little bit like the discharge curve. It appears steeper on the left than it does on thte right where i appears to flatten. This might imply even LONGER lifetimes if it si flatter at 1500 cycles than at 400 for example.
Jack Rickard
The basic concept is that we can use the TBS E-Xpro instrument to monitor state of charge by AH. And we can kind of flexibly define a percentage SOC based on any AH value we like. The unit will close a relay when a defined value is reached. But a relay to what?
I have a bevy of daughters. Not to denigrate them, but they are not precisely EV enthusiasts, although they like cars and like the feel of an electric. But when out and about, if they did start to "run out of gas", I'm trying to visualize something that would convey to them that it is time to go home, and if they don't go home, it will cost Dad about $9000 in batteries.
An LED probably won't cut it. I can picture a daughter saying "Hmmm, a light. I wonder what that's about. I better ask Dad when I get home." She would then continue her travels until it suited her.
With a buzzer or audio alarm - "Hmm, that's certainly annoying. I better ask Dad to fix that next time I see him. "
So what can I do to get her to have a sense of urgency that there is something wrong with the car that needs attention NOW.
Well of course we could easily wire this up to a controller input to disable the controller. But this is a little extreme. What if she is in traffic and needs to get off the road?
The concept we've settled on is in no ways original. It is commonly referred to as limp mode and indeed there are some ways to do it in the controller. Our Curtis determines state of charge by voltage and I'm none too enamored of that. I want to use the AH counter.
So we devised a very simple little box, it has not enough circuitry to even be considered a circuit. Indeed there is no circuit board. It's a couple of resistors wired across the terminals of a relay.
In normal operation, it simply passes the 0-5v throttle signal from the throttle through the normally closed contacts of a 12v automotive relay to the controlller.
We can use a small dash mounted switch OR the TBS amp hour counter relay to pass 12v to the valet box to activate it.
This simply divides down the voltage to about 1/4 of its normal value before connecting it to the controller. I've added a 5K pot to trim this from the 1/4 value down to zero basically.
We also made kind of a discovery with our Vantage Vehicles GreenVan. This miniature van is a very el cheapo little Chinese cargo van that is SO small and SO basic and so ugly it actually starts to look cute. The company is based in Corona California (http://www.vantagevehicle.com).
But we were surprised to learn they used some pretty high quality components in the "conversion" they do to these vehicles. The system is 72v but use some unidentified but physically enormous AGM cells of 198Ah. The charger is a DeltaQ. These are really pretty nice chargers though not adjustable. The only reason we don't talk more about them is they are just focused on the low voltage market. I think the highest voltage they will do in their product line is 96volts. And just about no one is doing 96v in EVland. It's kind of a Neighborhood ELectric Vehicle thing.
The motor is also a little mysterious, but seems to be a 10HP three phase AC induction system with a 35 HP peak rating.
To drive that, we were a little astounded to find a Curtis 1238-6501 three phase controller. This is the 80V version of the controller we are using in the Speedster (Curtis 1238-7501).
The system appears to do regenerative braking only on applying the brakes. I'm increasingly leaning toward this on the Speedster and the Mini is now dialed down to very low values when you take your foot of the accelerator, but quite a bit when applying brakes.
The GreenVan does this a little differently. Instead of simply keying on the brake light signal, they employ a pressure transducer in the brake line to convert brake pressure to a 0-5v signal into the controller. The transducer gets 5v and ground from the controller, and puts out a voltage varying across its 500 psi range.
I thought this transducer might be hard to find. We located the company that makes it, MEAS Specialties, and contacted them. Never even got a reply to an e-mail. Before calling, I looked around a bit on the net and worked out their part number scheme. Turns out, it is VERY commonly available on Digikey at $104 each - Digikey part number MSP3501P2-ND. And you can get them at various pressures, 250 psi, 500 psi, 1000 psi etc. This might be important. I don't know how well our Speedster pressures will match the GreenVan's.
Anyway, this will take some experimentation to get the feel right, and may not be enough improvement to justify the effort. But I like the feel of the GreenVan's brakes.
May 15th marked the 1 year anniversary of our first video post. As many of you know I was in publishing before (print magazine) and just love the business. I've tried other businesses, but after publishing, nothing really makes any sense to me. I've seen them and they didn't make sense. So I would try them myself, and was surprised to learn I had nothing to learn there. Most of them just don't make much sense. It's hard to move heavy objects around for a 30% markup.
One of the things about publishing that I understand viscerally is about the flow of information. You give it away. To anybody who will listen. And you can't give it away FAST enough to avoid becoming successful at it. The only way to fail at publishiing really is through a lack of generosity of spirit. If you start viewing information as proprietary and valuable, you generally sell off the office furniture at auction a few months later. If you strive to pick up information gems and IMMEDIATELY give them way, it seems it rains money and other good things.
This is a bit counterintuitive. But one of the keys is that the information is not one way, and you are not really the producer. If people find the info useful, and gradually come to trust that it isn't a trick, they start to add to it. It's kind of a stone soup process. You of course have to initiiate it with the stone. But soon people are showing up with cartots, vegetables, onions, potatoes, etc.
Basically, you become a goto focal point where people can usefully promulgate useful information. As these contacts improve in quantity and quality, your information flow improves dramatically, and becomes something quite beyond what you are actually capapable of. Your role kind of devolves to sorting and categorizing, trying to filter through to find the gems that your readership, in this can viewership, might find useful. The more useful, the more people tune in, and the information sources grow and improve.
The good news is that you wind up with a lot of information. The bad news is, there are some real world problems publishing all of it. This gets a little hard to explain. But what made us very successful at Boardwatch was we got very good at sorting out the bullshit from the infogems - initially through hard work and experimentation. But over time we just developed a feel for it. But the other skill that is kind of hard define, goes hand in hand with the generosity of spirit.
It's actually hard to describe. If I use the word "tact" the people that know me in the forums I've just left are going to laugh outloud. Simillarly "appropriate judgement" rather fails. How about a "sensitivity to info issues."
Most everyone loves secrets. And the greatest joy is in telling them. Even greater is seeing them told widely. And often the value of the infornation is kind of tied to how secret it is. Scarcity being a key element in the value of anything.
Unfortunately, in the real world, we face certain ethical dilemmas. We may not quite approve of what our employer is doing and have a need to get some information out, but on the other hand, you don't want to lose your job in today's economy - with a couple of young children to feed and an upside down house payment.
So the GM Volt engineer loves to call and chat about some very interesting things. But if her employer knew she was putting this info out, there would be a rather immediate career change. And often, just the nature of the information points to the likely source.
So one of the frustrations is that I wind up with some inflows that are terribly interesting, but I don't know precisely how to deal with them without wrecking lives and careers. At one time, I was pretty brutal with this. "If you have a secret that needs to be a secret, why in the hell are you calling a magazine editor?"
Unfortunately, our actions have consequences, and often the consequences are someone ELSE's consequence. And if you see this go down a couple of times, you just can't help but become a bit more discrete. Time heals all. Often a month or so in the "aging cellar" changes the whole situation and no harm no foul then.
Sometimes, I can just generate this info out of thin air without attributing a source. That makes me look very smart. That's not precisely the goal. If it came to me in a dream or I'm a little vague about it, occasionally there is a reason. But it appears it would damage someone or something if I get too detailed on where it came from.
That's all a rather long winded tour of the joys of journalism. I really like the position and I'm frightfully good at it. But like Chess or Bridge, you never really master it. Actually, I always assume some portion of our viewership/readership is actually a lot more knowledgeable and a lot more intelligent than I am. It's not ALWAYS the case, but it's a good assumption to start from and particularly appropos in technical fields. Everyone is a specialist. And by definition I have to be a generalist. So, it's pretty real. Those in that ca
tegory will hopefully pick up from this why some elements of EVTV are always going to look a little odd.
For the rest, here's a little example. You may or may not know that I'm particularly enamored of these Chinese prismatic cells. Of course the reason is obviously weight and volume to power - they make electric cars viable in a way that lead acid, NiMH, etc simply cannot in a very ratiometric fashion. The particulars of the lead acid battery are immaterial. At that size and that weight and that power, it just doesn't work except for toy demonstrators.
But for now, the price is high. So high, that the only way this works is if the cells last a very very long time compared to the other battery technologies. If you have to replace them every three or four years, you have simply moved the operating expense from the gas pump to the battery store.
But at some point in longevity, rather keyed to the life of the car, the expense moves out of the recurring operating category and into the capital expense of the vehicle itself. We no longer talk about miles per engine. In fact, miles per tire used to be an EXTREMELY important factor in tire sales. It just isn't anymore. True, we go through a few sets in the life of the car. But somewhere past 50,000 miles, we ceased caring very much.
The heart of all this is that a good Trojan lead acid cell is rated at 350 cycles. The LiFePo4 cells are spec'd at 2000 cycles if we limit discharge to 80%, and 3000 cycles at 70%. Thundersky recently went to 3000 and 5000.
Those deeply experienced in the lead acid pool, have pooh-poohed this forever as being hopelessly optimistic. I feel their pain, but I've known for some time that it is off base. Part of this is cultural and part technical. The good news is that your LiFePo4 cells will last a VERY long time unless you actually destroy them, and of course a BMS is a quick way to accomplish this.
The cultural part is pretty broad. You have to understand the Chinese a little bit. "Managers and Scientists" are very highly regarded there. "Salesmen" are almost viewed in the same light as street hawkers selling roast peanuts. And it is not seemly to brag on your children. Indeed there are some serious karmic issues with mentioning your children in a positive light. And finally, if you ask a question of a superior in China, you are basically challenging him. If it is something for you to know, he would have already told you.
This all sets us up for some serious disconnects with America. First, in the good ol' USA, if you will do 180AH sometimes, even for a second, label it 180AH. Better, let's call it 190AH. Who measures? If it's a problem, we can always add a four point disclaimer at the bottom of the back page.
In most American corporations, the sales and marketing guys not only pretty much rule the game, that's almost always where the CEO's come from.
What you will find in dealing with the Chinese is that if they tout it as a feature or specific value, it will ALWAYS exceed that value - or at least they really did believe it would. They actually pad things the OTHER way. We're right around 190AH, - label it 180AH and we will not appear unseemly.
Second, the sales person you might be dealing with is essentially POWERLESS in the organization. They have to get permission to use the restrooms. And if you press them for technical information necessary to make the sale, you put them in a very awkward position. They either have to go appear to challenge their boss, a very painful prospect, or risk losing the sale. They do NOT work on commission as is common here, but failure is its own reward in China and you do NOT want to fail as a salesmen. There is no lower place to fall to. So you might note a little stress from a simple question about how they come up with cycle life data.
In China QUALITY is the golden horizon. The executives there actually do not understand why we want all this info. Don't we know they are claiming to have the HIGHEST QUALITY - GUARANTEED. Who would want more than that?
Finally, they're just a bit secretive about everything germane. I myself don't quite undetstand this, but all Chinese drama centers on a secret. The companies who make these batteries are not scientific in nature. They discover nothing and they invent nothing. They do develop manufacturing processes to ensure quality and output. The cathode material in the China Avaition Lithium Battery Company cell comes from a company titled ALEES in Taiwan. They buy it by the barrel. Similarly, you can buy aluminum foil and copper foil in China in a wondrous array of widths, lengths, and weights and some if it even perforated in various ways.
What you know of as a battery company in China develops clean rooms and workshops with some automation and they order these materials and produce a lot of cells - 1000 cells per day say. They know about as much about the chemistry as my daughter does.
They DO do testing, for quality purposes. And of course to develop better batteries with higher outputs etc. But the data is for internal use only and indeed, the salesmen aren't normally very privy to it.
I did stumble upon a pretty bright sales guy with Sky Energy. And he was pretty good at hunting down information although this was a painful process taking weeks and dozens of e-mails to get even the most basic info. He appears to have not made the cut in the transition to CALB - probably too inquiring and uppity.
One of the most fascinting things I got from him was an actual .XLS spreadsheet listing the AH values from 500 cycles of testing for what they term "attenuation" or the decrease in capacity over time from cycling the cells. I got one of these for the 180AH cells and one for the 100AH cells, with two cells tested and the actual values. I've prepared a couple of simple graphs from this data.
There are a couple if interesting things about this test. First, the 500 cycle length is impressive. This is 500 actual cycles, in a world where lead acid cells are ESTIMATED to have a 350 cycle life. They show a pretty uniform 5% degrade from their initial value - and it appears to be quite linear. That implies 2000 cycles easily to 80% of initial capacity.
More encouraging, the initial value is ABOVE the rated capacity. And indeed we are just starting to break below advertised specs AT 500 CYCLES.
The tests are of course at a very moderate 0.3C. But the thing that just blows me away is that all 500 cycles are to 100% discharge - not 80% or 70%. They run until the voltage at 0.3C breaks 2.0v which is their definition on the spec sheets of 100% discharge.
So what the data appears to show is a minimum 2000 cycle life at 100% discharge. They are fudging this to 2000 cycles limited to 80% and 3000 cycles limited to 70%.
In America, we would test at 50% DOD, claim the 3000 cycles, and not mention this silly depth of discharge thing at all. Or else it would appear at the bottom of the back cover of the report with a tiny little cross and in 2 point type.
So I am very taken with the prospects for long life from these cells. They just appear to be bullet proof to me.
Another interesting aspect that explains some of my own observations. These cells appear to INCREASE in capacity over the first 50-75 cycles. Further, the curve made looks just a little bit like the discharge curve. It appears steeper on the left than it does on thte right where i appears to flatten. This might imply even LONGER lifetimes if it si flatter at 1500 cycles than at 400 for example.
Jack Rickard
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
